Re: About Database Schema Designer [was: Re: [Modeling-users] Pythonic, and non-XML, Model description]

[Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...>]

Replying to my message:
>   I was really surprised by the way relations are mapped to
>   relationships. If I'm not wrong, you're mapping them to 'to-one'
>   relationship, unconditionally. However, when I tried the tool, I ca=
me to
>   the opposite opinion, because of the 2nd screenshot:
>   http://www.danny.cz/screenshots/datadesigner1.jpg
>=20
>   Given that "firmy" has an attribute "forma_id" which is also the PK=
 of
>   entity "forma" and that the former entity has a relation to the lat=
ter, my
>   first conclusion was that the relations were intended to model to-m=
any
>   relationships... But czech is greek to me ;) so this is nothing mor=
e than
>   an intuition.

Did I really write that ?-: Now I'm surprised again... Looks like my br=
ain
was in stanby-mode for this one.  Just forget the stupid remark: my fir=
st
conclusion should have been "relations model to-one rels", just as expe=
cted
given the DB-schema described here.


-- S=E9bastien.