Re: [Modeling-users] Limit
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
sbigaret
|
From: Sebastien B. <sbi...@us...> - 2003-02-21 15:24:02
|
> Limit to a fixed maximum number? Don't think you can (for Sebastien to
> confirm) unless there is hidden support for specifying TOP N on SELEC=
Ts
> (which i think is not standard SQL?). And, how would you get the next=
batch
> then?
Sorry soif, Mario's right... there's currently no way to limit or bat=
ch
the fetch. However EditingContext.objectsCountWithFetchSpecification()
will tell you how many objects (in fact, the upper limit) you'll get =
if
you send the same parameters to objectsWithFetchSpecification().
More on this: if someone knows some standard SQL for doing this, I'm
interested, it would for sure make the release-time for such a featur=
e,
if requested, closer than it actually is.
> would be really nice to have a generic declarative way for this
> (essentially cursors, or paging, but as far the client app code is
> concerned, there should be no worries about maintaining state
> information).
Sure. Know what? It's on the TODO list :)
Cheers,
-- S=E9bastien.
PS: I'll be off from now until tomorrow evening, but you can still expe=
ct
v0.9 being released this week-end.
>=20
> > Hi all :)
> >
> >
> > I'm just wondering how can i limit the result fetched by
> > a qualifier. I think i forgot how this work :)
> >
> >
|