=20
> Built fine here on RH8.
I did some RedHat8 RPMs they can be found on SourceForge as well. If you
know any one who could be enlisted to package different Platforms, let
me know.
> Just one question: why *lower* the version number? The previous version
> was 1.0.5a, and now the new one is 1.0.0rc1... that'll cause headaches
> with RPM, for example. How about bumping the number for the new version
> to 1.0.6 (or anything > 1.0.5a...)?
I admit my logic was a bit queer. I numbered with the added a such as
1.0.5a meaning 1.0.5a < 1.0.0 since 5a is alpha and 0 is not. I know
that was a bad choice. Right now I seriously thought of adopting kernel
versioning 1.0.0 is stable 1.1.0 is not 1.2.0 is. So I think this will
happen when this turns stable it will be 1.2.0
Thank you again for making this point to me again. If all agree this is
what will happen.
> --=20
> \/ille Skytt=C3=A4
> ville.skytta at iki.fi
>=20
>=20
--=20
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Philipp Dunkel <ph...@du...>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
