mod-xml-general Mailing List for mod_xml (Page 3)
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
nrkew
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(32) |
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
2010 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Nick K. <ni...@we...> - 2002-05-24 20:17:10
|
Hi, I've looked at it now - sorry about the delay. Looks basically good, but I have one issue with it. On Linux it built first time for me. On FreeBSD it doesn't, because mod_xml.la referencessrc/mod_xml.la. This could be a make vs gnu-make thing. Anyway, I think we should use a makefile in src/ to build src/mod_xml.la. That seems to me to be the clean way to solve this. Any thoughts? Also, I'd suggest making gnome the default build. Not important, but gnome is a much lighter-weight library, and should give the best performance for applications that don't need Xerces-only capabilities. I have some further updates to checkin when I can find a round tuit, and am making a start on some decent docs! Regards, -- Nick Kew |
From: Nick K. <ni...@we...> - 2002-05-15 23:43:24
|
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Philipp Dunkel wrote: > 3rd I have no idea what you are talking about with the callback concept. The > problem remains that before parsing transforming I need the entire document > in one buffer, otherwise I won't get a DOM-like structure that I can pass to > the tranformation. What I had in mind was to build the Doctree using a progressive parse, as the mod_xml main handler does (if you select a DOM parser). This avoids the thorny realloc/or equivalent problem. I have not managed to do that for XSLT. However, I have come to the view that the realloc has to go, so I've updated mod_xml to do: (1) If Content-length is set, we use that to alloc a memory buffer in one. (2) If Content-Length is not available, we use a tempfile. A possible future enhancement would be to allow this choice to be controlled by configuration options, though I'd still prefer a progressive parse. To accompany that, we have a couple of optimisations: (3) If the main parser is used, it can pass a doctree to the XSLT filter, which will then omit the parse altogether (4) (not yet done) A main handler for static XML docs, that will shortcircuit the normal process and have the XSLT parser read the XML doc in the manner of a main handler. I have not yet checked in this lot, but since it addresses one important issue we've been debating I thought it worth running by you! Regards, -- Nick Kew |
From: Nick K. <ni...@we...> - 2002-05-08 23:24:14
|
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Stephane Peiry wrote: > For the conf part it was my intention to get (as a "first" > step) the with-[gnome|apache] option done. Now that I have > your agreement ;) Ill commit something over the we. By the > way, my intention implies a small directory reorganization > (i.e.: all the source under a "src" directory, docs under > "doc", etc., as the first tar you received implied) if thats > ok for you then Ill do the changes "per cvs". No problem with a [src|doc] reorg (besides, there isn't any real doc yet:-) Just so long as the apache-specific and gnome-specific bits are suitably organised in their own areas, it should be fine. -- Nick Kew |