[mod-xhtml-neg-cvs] mod_xhtml_neg mod_xhtml_neg.c,1.11,1.12
Brought to you by:
run2000
From: <ru...@us...> - 2004-03-11 13:28:58
|
Update of /cvsroot/mod-xhtml-neg/mod_xhtml_neg In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv14498 Modified Files: mod_xhtml_neg.c Log Message: Fixed up header comments relating to Etag headers. Index: mod_xhtml_neg.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/mod-xhtml-neg/mod_xhtml_neg/mod_xhtml_neg.c,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -C2 -d -r1.11 -r1.12 *** mod_xhtml_neg.c 11 Mar 2004 12:59:49 -0000 1.11 --- mod_xhtml_neg.c 11 Mar 2004 13:02:19 -0000 1.12 *************** *** 70,73 **** --- 70,77 ---- * Also deals with issues contained in RFC 2854. * + * From http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content-negotiation + * Etags should be unique for each content-type returned. This is done by + * adding our own suffix to Etag headers when a negotiation is successful. + * * Author: Nicholas Cull <ru...@us...> * Date: 1 March 2004 *************** *** 81,92 **** * 0.9 ETag handled correctly for different content types. * - * Todo: - * - * Make sure Etag is handled correctly. I assume from - * http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content-negotiation - * that Etags should be unique for each content-type returned. This should - * be doable by intercepting requests containing If-None-Match headers - * and fixing up Etags on the way in, and by adding our own prefix to - * Etag headers on the way out. * * Directives: --- 85,88 ---- |