Re: [mod-security-users] mod_security or deny, allow to protect a specail directory

[Jochen K. <fvg...@wl...>]

Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 20:25 +0100 schrieb Ivan Ristic:
> On 4/24/06, Jochen Kaechelin <fvg...@wl...> wrote:
> > <Directory /var/www/pics.gissmoh.de/test>
> >   SecFilterEngine On
> >   SecFilterSelective REMOTE_ADDR "!^xxx\.xxx\.xxx\.xxx$" deny
> > </Directory>
> >
> > or
> >
> > <Directory /var/www/pics.gissmoh.de/test>
> >   Order deny,allow
> >   Deny from all
> >   Allow from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> > </Directory>
> 
> This one. Why use ModSecurity for things possible with stock Apache.

OK, you right! I'am very impressed by mod_security..so I thought maybe
the technique mod_security uses is more stable/secure than the features
implemented in stock apache. 

And I love to add the redirect-feature to
select different actions according to different remote ips.


-- 
wlanhacking.de
http://mail.wlanhacking.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Frauen sind die einzigsten Opfer die auf ihre Jäger lauern!