Re: [mod-security-users] Ideas for future features..

[Michael S. <mi...@go...>]

Zach Roberts wrote:
>>
>>  Forking to execute a Perl script might not be feasible, but
>>  talking to an already-running daemon may be better. I'd really
>>  hate to see ModSecurity integrate a spam checker :)
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> I would hate to see the spam checker daemon die for some reason and
> then Apache serve broken pages.
>
> Perhaps backreferences and RBL lookups built internally for the sake
> of the system administrators? ;)

Or just fail safe with a pass.