Re: [mod-security-users] Ideas for future features..
Brought to you by:
victorhora,
zimmerletw
|
From: Michael S. <mi...@go...> - 2006-02-26 04:01:46
|
Ivan Ristic wrote: >> I believe this sort of checking needs to be internal. Accessing an >> external Perl script for example would be far too resource intensive if >> it were used to scan a very large number of incoming connections. >> > > > Forking to execute a Perl script might not be feasible, but > talking to an already-running daemon may be better. I'd really > hate to see ModSecurity integrate a spam checker :) > Oh god, please no internal spam checker. :-) |