Hi Ervin,
I will see about getting the latest 3.0.3 + stable outside of the
channels to see if it fixes our issue.
Thanks,
Brad
On 06/20/2018 03:46 PM, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Brad Zynda wrote:
>> Hey Everyone,
>>
>> Currently we are using mod_security.x86_64 2.9.2-1.el7 @centos7-x86_64
>>
>> Happy to see it is parallel with 2 and written in C! (may need a box of
>> kleenex)
>>
>>
>> So we are seeing the multipart -- error specific to
>> https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/issues/652
>>
>> It really does not get into details as to which parses should be used or
>> specific ones that cause this error.
>
> perhaps you have this one:
>
> SecRule MULTIPART_UNMATCHED_BOUNDARY ....
>
> but it's fixed (only in 3.0.3):
>
> https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/pull/1747
>
> Note, that you can read about this at here:
>
> https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/pull/1801/commits/e0b3580370f01deeaa45d8f9a7893a77ad097937
>
> so, of you want to avoid the error above (request denied with
> file which contains "--" at the begin of line) you have to use
> this rule:
>
> SecRule MULTIPART_UNMATCHED_BOUNDARY "@eq 1" "id:'200004',phase:2,t:none,log,deny,msg:'Multipart parser detected a possible unmatched boundary.'"
>
> instead of the uncommented (original) line.
>
>
>
>
> regards,
>
>
> a.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> mod-security-developers mailing list
> mod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-security-developers
> ModSecurity Services from Trustwave's SpiderLabs:
> https://www.trustwave.com/spiderLabs.php
>
|