Carles Bonamusa wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Next step in our road-map of improving mod_security is to add some
> protection
> to html forms. Attached to this mail I've set an initial proposal of our
> ideas
> of some ways of achieving html forms security. It would be great if you
> could
> check this ideas out and share your comments/ideas as you kindly did back
> when we discussed about cookie management.
Thanks! I'll review it over the weekend and respond by Monday.
> We've been also working on a first approach to comment removal. As far
> as it
> goes we're having some issues trying to manage tricky situations where
> non-standard markup can fool libxml and so fool our comment stripping code,
> but for the very standard case this new feature is almost coded and tested.
Great!
> By the way, I would like to congratulate you for the work you've done on
> latest 2.0 version. It is really a huge rewrite that has brought so much
> clarity and readability to ms code, in addition to all new features and the
> ones to come due to brand new ms internal structure.
Thanks. It's been a lot of hard work. But it's something I have planned
for many months. Just FYI there's another bit missing, which I plan
to implement to accommodate your contributions - a framework for ModSecurity
modules. (There's not much work left to do.)
> Last but not least, we expect to be able to port/merge our contributions to
> 2.x branch as soon as I'm back from my holidays and form protection is
> coded and
> tested.
Excellent. I will do my best to make that happen sooner rather than
later.
--
Ivan Ristic, Technical Director
Thinking Stone, http://www.thinkingstone.com
ModSecurity: Open source Web Application Firewall
Apache Security (O'Reilly): http://www.apachesecurity.net
|