Thanks for looking at this so fast. Agree that RESPONSE_BODY isn't for everyone but in my case I do want to record and sanitize it.
>From the doc I thought this would do the trick. I'll look at changing the code ( or my requirements! ).
Also, I want to do the REQUEST_BODY and from my read of the code I will hit the same issue. Do you believe that it should work? I see code in msc_logging.c for it but I'm not the offsets will ever get recorded.
> Hey Jeff, > > Looking at the code, since we are using part of the same code of > sanitzematched and it doesn't support RESPONSE_BODY variable you are seeing > that msg. The reason for that is it's not common people enable RESPONSE_BODY > to be logged in production env, because the log dir/file will increase a > lot. > > I will discuss internally if we will move to the direction to support > RESPONSE_BODY in sanitizematched action. > > Thanks > > Breno