From: Joyce P. <tru...@ya...> - 2003-04-03 23:29:13
|
--- Adam Rifkin <Ad...@Kn...> wrote: > Lucas wrote: > > No worries about the clarity, you can tell Joyce I said so. :) > > I believe she's on the list here. Just slumbering. ;) Present and accounted for, sir! I don't EXACTLY remember saying Adam was a less clear writer than he thinks he is... I'm sure I was quoted out of context. :-) > The Perl CGI supports on the order of a dozen connections and > on the order of a dozen messages per second. I respectfully submit that you'd be insane to count on this level of performance over time in production -- esp if you're talking about a dozen DIFFERENT connections per second, each getting just one event. Even the Apache version requires careful tuning to make it plausible for some jobs. > Running the Python server from a command line can increase the > number of connections even more. The Python server is by far the most efficient... but it's not connected to a Web server. I can't personally imagine wanting to administer one of these suckers under those circumstances... but then I'm no Python wizard. > > Regarding the live javascript connection... Brilliant! > > (though hacky... That's our motto! JP __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com |