Re: [Mod-pubsub-developer] Java client update/rewrite

[Asynch M. <asy...@ho...>]

I'm interested in following the development & helping.
I think following the protocol specification is a better route - that avoids
accidental coupling with other client stacks & also may help expose
ambiguously documented features.

Why does the java client need to be re-written?
Are there pieces that just don't work at all? Is it a stylistic thing?
It's been a few months since I looked at the source, but I thought it was
working okay.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Leftwich" <ro...@le...>
To: <mod...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:02 PM
Subject: [Mod-pubsub-developer] Java client update/rewrite


> I've managed to get some time to update/rewrite the mps Java client (and
> there was much rejoicing - well, from me at least).
>
> Firstly, is anyone else tackling this? If so, do you want to team up? If
> not, the current plan is to implement it based on pubsublib.py, on the
> assumption that this is fairly feature complete. Is this a valid
assumption?
>
> Thoughts/comments welcome!
>
> Robert
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 5/03/2004
>