RE: [Mod-pubsub-developer] libkn released; notes from 1/2003 MPSUG

[Tommy H. <th...@ch...>]

Hi,

To those who don't know me, I'm currently an employee of KnowNow and
I've been working on some Windows connectivity stuff on my own time. I'm
getting close to releasing a version of my stuff that is based on a C++
framework that has the following feature:

 * Supports all Windows platforms: Win98, WinME, WinNT, Win2K, WinXP,
and WinCE 3.0.
 * Multiple interfaces to the C++ code: COM/ActiveX and .NET.
 * Thread-safe supporting multithreaded applications.
 * Doxygen comments.
 * cppunit-based unit tests.
 * Sample applications.
 * Based on WinInet to support proxies and SSL easily.

I don't know the exact timeframe of when I will be releasing it, but it
is soon. However, I don't expect people to wait until I release it. If
you are working on something native to .NET, there's no reason why there
can't be more than one version. I would be interested in other versions
of any client libraries.

Either Adam or I will make an announcement when it becomes available.

Thanks.
Tommy


-----Original Message-----
From: Asynch Messaging [mailto:asy...@ho...]=20
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:15 AM
To: mod...@li...
Subject: Re: [Mod-pubsub-developer] libkn released; notes from 1/2003
MPSUG



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Rifkin" <Ad...@Kn...>
>
>    ACTION ITEM #2: Once this tarball ships, the next step is to
"Windows-enable" c_pubsub so we have connectivity to
> Windows desktops, as Mike Dierken and Jeff Barr have discussed in the=20
> past
and as KnowNow currently offers.
This sounds cool. What's the thinking? Are we talking about a COM object
that raises events that are visible from scripted clients - essentially
a COM interface to a 'router' object with
subscribe()/publish()/unsubscribe()
methods? If so, I've got some preliminary work in that area - I just
need to originating event to toss up.

>    2. We acknowledged how much we love Mike's AmazonPop application,=20
> but
noted that it crashes
> ungracefully "in stupid, ugly, unpredictable ways".
And unreported ways - isn't there a bug system on SourceForge? Not that
I'd actually do anything about the problems, but at least they'd be
listed somewheres...


> ACTION ITEM: Think about a mod_pubsub weblog.  Can any good come from
having one, or should we just
> stick to the mailing list for now?
I think a persistent log of thoughts and surface discussion is useful,
especially if it ties in other technology and ideas. It's often easier
than a mailing list archive. It also gets into blogs which are growing
in their use of pub/sub concepts. So I vote yes on a weblog.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =3D Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Mod-pubsub-developer mailing list
Mod...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-pubsub-developer