From: Gonzalo A. <gon...@gm...> - 2006-08-24 17:17:56
|
On 8/24/06, Matej Urbas <mat...@gm...> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 09:57 -0300, Gonzalo Arana wrote: > > I agree about making it optional. I am thinking in something like: > > Cache non LoadEHTML'es files as well, but those are checked on each hit. > > AutoCacheEHTMLFiles directive? > > There is a catch with the upper directive: > > If we decide to use the directive on a per .htaccess basis, we'll have > to make sure that every access to lib_cache is synchronized - regardless > of whether the option is turned off for all directories or not (the > catch is it's hard to know whether the option is turned off for all > directories or not...) Do you see what I'm trying to say? mmm you mean synchronized due to multi-thread access? If it is a per-server variable, I believe there is no need for syncrhonization. Regards, -- Gonzalo A. Arana |