Hmmm. Now I'm a bit confused. I've checked the methods in the Mock object
and I can't see any setup methods. The idea of a setup method rather than
an expection, or as you put it, just get the thing working and don't check
the calls sounds great for the type of test I want.
Thanks
>The short answer is no, because that's the point of what you're testing.
> That said, you can use setup methods, rather than expectation, if you
>just want to get the thing to work and don't want to check the calls. We
>have some ideas about how to make things more flexible in the dynamic
>mock world.
|
