Menu
▾
▴
mockobjects-java-users
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2002-02-23 19:46:41
|
I've finally got around to doing something about the build process. I've started with support for versions 1.2 and 1.3 of j2ee -- the new script will build appropriately for whichever version of j2ee.jar you add to the lib directory. The next thing to fix will be versioning in the jdk libraries so we can finally incorporate all those jdbc fixes you've been posting (thanks). One thing I haven't figured out is what to do about the javadoc and how we might (or might not) include multiple versions of that. So far I've checked it into CVS. Please have a go at checking out and building at your end. I tried to upload a built zip, but I can't get through to the sourceforge ftp server. I'll try again tomorrow. Hang in there... Steve |
|
From: Tim M. <tim...@po...> - 2002-02-25 00:19:35
|
I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where you guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing? There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as well as an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee? Is this all part of the rework? Tim -----Original Message----- From: moc...@li... [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf Of Steve Freeman Sent: 23 February 2002 19:44 To: MockObjects; moc...@li... Subject: [MO-java-dev] build revision in progress I've finally got around to doing something about the build process. I've started with support for versions 1.2 and 1.3 of j2ee -- the new script will build appropriately for whichever version of j2ee.jar you add to the lib directory. The next thing to fix will be versioning in the jdk libraries so we can finally incorporate all those jdbc fixes you've been posting (thanks). One thing I haven't figured out is what to do about the javadoc and how we might (or might not) include multiple versions of that. So far I've checked it into CVS. Please have a go at checking out and building at your end. I tried to upload a built zip, but I can't get through to the sourceforge ftp server. I'll try again tomorrow. Hang in there... Steve _______________________________________________ Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list Moc...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002 |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2002-02-25 10:34:39
|
From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...> > I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where you > guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing? nice to see you got it working ;-) it's under j2ee/common. > There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as well as > an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee? the j2ee files are split between - 1.2 - versions specific to version 1.2 of j2ee - 1.3 - much the same for 1.3 - common - versions common to both We need to do the same for the jdk libraries so we can add in the new SQL stuff S. |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2002-02-25 10:34:39
|
From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...> > I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where you > guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing? nice to see you got it working ;-) it's under j2ee/common. > There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as well as > an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee? the j2ee files are split between - 1.2 - versions specific to version 1.2 of j2ee - 1.3 - much the same for 1.3 - common - versions common to both We need to do the same for the jdk libraries so we can add in the new SQL stuff S. |
|
From: Tim M. <tim...@po...> - 2002-02-26 01:02:35
|
Except that it doesn't work in that the tests don't pass because the class is mising and it won't compile out of the box. We need a default lineup where you can compile the default lineup. Is jdk 1.3 and j2ee bollocks this lineup? (probably - if thats where servlets are located, and this is what most people want to do from postings I see). Its quite easy for people to ignore tests if they choose not to download other components. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Steve Freeman [mailto:st...@m3...] Sent: 25 February 2002 10:26 To: Tim Mackinnon; moc...@li...; MockObjects Subject: Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] RE: [MO-java-dev] build revision in progress From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...> > I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where you > guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing? nice to see you got it working ;-) it's under j2ee/common. > There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as well as > an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee? the j2ee files are split between - 1.2 - versions specific to version 1.2 of j2ee - 1.3 - much the same for 1.3 - common - versions common to both We need to do the same for the jdk libraries so we can add in the new SQL stuff S. --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002 |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2002-02-27 23:40:54
|
Well then, we need to move those tests that apply only to j2ee classes. Similarly for the examples, which I haven't got around to yet. Given that you chaps are about the only people I know still using Java 1.1, would you like to put in any fixes for that version? We could finally sort out that compatibility jar. S. From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...> > Except that it doesn't work in that the tests don't pass because the class > is mising and it won't compile out of the box. We need a default lineup > where you can compile the default lineup. Is jdk 1.3 and j2ee bollocks this > lineup? (probably - if thats where servlets are located, and this is what > most people want to do from postings I see). Its quite easy for people to > ignore tests if they choose not to download other components. |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X