Hi Ringo,
MockObjects 0.09 has simply introduced the new dyna mock feature. It
does not mean that the static mocks should not be used. They present
some nice advantages, like offering a cleaner interface, strong typing,
work without interfaces, etc. But they are not available for everything,
so you need both dyna mock and static mocks.
In any case, you should present the 0.09 version to your team.
Hope it helps,
-Vincent
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...] On Behalf
Of
> DeS...@em...
> Sent: 03 June 2003 16:25
> To: moc...@li...
> Subject: [MO-java-users] What's the way to go? DynaMock?
>
> Hello,
>
> Together with a colleague, I am rolling out test-driven development
within
> the company. We already presented an introduction to unit testing.
Next
> week, we have planned sessions on advanced techniques like
MockObjects.
> Since most of the people in the company don't know a lot about
> MockObjects,
> we can start from scratch and present what we think it should be.
However,
> with the introduction of DynaMock in release 0.09, I am unsure what to
> present. Should I present MockObjects based on the 0.07 incarnation,
or
> should I go all the way to 0.09 and DynaMock? What's the future going
to
> be?
>
> Ringo
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
> Get office equipment for less on eBay!
> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-users mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-users
|
