another thing, after all that naming stuff last week. The getter in the
.Net version is called MockInstance(), which seems to describe the
situation quite adequately.
Tim, I expect you'll getting more intimate with .Net in your new role.
Good luck.
S.
Tim Mackinnon wrote:
> Oh yes - forgot to add, we did a bit of an excerise with the name, and I
> think your name "DynaMock" appears to be the best (there was some talk about
> Moxy - but a google search shows lots of other things by that name, one
> specific one is a type of proxy library as well).
>
> So I would like to sort out what we can, and then re-launch the thing with
> the name.
|
