Think that stuff is stable but I've probably just added a load of less
stable stuff in the form of the alt.java classes.
I say unstable but most of them haven't changed for a couple of weeks,
and at the moment they do what I need so I have no great plans to add to
them immediately (Apart from alt.java.io.File, which I'm just working
on).
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 23:01, Steve Freeman wrote:
> I think we're grossly overdue.
>
> Do we think that the split in the JDK libraries is stable?
>
> S.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Martin" <je...@mk...>
> To: "MockObjects" <moc...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:14 PM
> Subject: [MO-java-dev] Release? what release?
>
>
> > What are the criteria for deciding when we want to release a release.
> > It's a while since we did one, but on the other hand we've not reach
> > anything that feels like a milestone. On the other hand I'm not sure
> > there is such a thing as the mocks just seem to evolve.
> > --
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> > Moc...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so..._______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
--
|
