mockobjects-java-dev

[Mockobjects-java-dev] build organisation

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

d2l0aCB0aGUgYWRkaXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGptcyBsaWJyYXJ5LCBpdCBzdHJpa2VzIG1lIHRoYXQg
d2Ugc2hvdWxkIGFkZCBhIG5ldyBzdWJzZWN0aW9uIHRvIG91ciBzcmMgZGlyZWN0b3J5LCB3aGlj
aCB3b3VsZCBnaXZlIHVzOg0KICBjb3JlDQogIGV4YW1wbGVzDQogIGV4dGVuc2lvbnMNCg0KYW5k
LCBwb3NzaWJseSwNCg0KICBqMmVlDQogICAgc2VydmxldHMNCiAgICBqbXMNCg0KQXMgdGhlIGxp
YnJhcnkgZ3Jvd3MsIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCB3b3VsZCBnaXZlIGEgYmV0dGVyIGJhbGFuY2UgdG8g
dGhlIGJ1aWxkLg0KDQpTdGV2ZQ0KDQo=

Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] build organisation

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

If I remember correctly that's what I proposed some time ago so I am more
than happy with that :-). I would even go as far as :

core (contains mock core library)
j2se (contains j2se mocks)
j2ee (contains j2ee mocks)
extensions (contains other "exotic" libraries)

That we deliver as mo-java-core.jar, mo-java-j2se.jar, mo-java-j2ee.jar and
mo-java-extensions.jar

-Vincent

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...>
To: <moc...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:16 PM
Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] build organisation


> with the addition of the jms library, it strikes me that we should add a
new subsection to our src directory, which would give us:
>   core
>   examples
>   extensions
>
> and, possibly,
>
>   j2ee
>     servlets
>     jms
>
> As the library grows, I think that would give a better balance to the
build.
>
> Steve
>
> 2?¡¸rÛjözùSX,X´Ê'?yˍ«uëS˲þX¶Ëº·~SzwþX¶ÏS˝ús?¡¸rÛjö

[MO-java-dev] Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] build organisation

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

RnJvbTogIlZpbmNlbnQgTWFzc29sIiA8dm1hc3NvbEBvY3RvLmNvbT4NCj4gSWYgSSByZW1lbWJl
ciBjb3JyZWN0bHkgdGhhdCdzIHdoYXQgSSBwcm9wb3NlZCBzb21lIHRpbWUgYWdvIHNvIEkgYW0g
bW9yZQ0KDQp5ZXMsIGJ1dCB3ZSBkaWRuJ3QgbmVlZCBpdCB0aGVuLiBOb3cgd2UgZG8gOy0pDQoN
Cj4gdGhhbiBoYXBweSB3aXRoIHRoYXQgOi0pLiBJIHdvdWxkIGV2ZW4gZ28gYXMgZmFyIGFzIDoN
Cg0KDQo=

Re: [MO-java-dev] Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] build organisation

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...>
To: <moc...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:24 AM
Subject: [MO-java-dev] Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] build organisation


> From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...>
> > If I remember correctly that's what I proposed some time ago so I am
more
>
> yes, but we didn't need it then. Now we do ;-)

that's where knowledge may be stronger than XP ... ;-)

[XP says YAGNI. Knowledge says : with my great experience I know that we'll
need it for sure soon enough ...]

>
> > than happy with that :-). I would even go as far as :
>
>
> 2?¡¸rÛjözùSX,X´Ê'?yˍ«uëS˲þX¶Ëº·~SzwþX¶ÏS˝ús?¡¸rÛjö