That seems like a good way of handling the future direction. I want to do an
alternate branch that would better match what I'm thinking of trying with
dynamockdotnet.
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf Of
> Nat Pryce
> Sent: 03 July 2003 15:16
> To: Moc...@Li...
> Subject: [MO-java-dev] Merging branches
>
>
> To help any merge between my branch and the head branch, I've
> put a page on
> the Mock Objects wiki describing the changes I made in my branch and why,
> along with voting boxes so that people can say whether they like
> or dislike
> each change.
>
> It's at: http://www.mockobjects.com/wiki/ChangesInNatsBranch
>
> Cheers,
> Nat.
>
> _______________________
> Dr. Nathaniel Pryce
> B13media Ltd.
> http://www.b13media.com
> +44 (0)7712 526 661
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003
|
