mockobjects-java-dev

Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] RE: [MO-java-dev] build revision in progress

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...>
> I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where
you
> guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing?

nice to see you got it working ;-)

it's under j2ee/common.

> There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as
well as
> an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee?

the j2ee files are split between
- 1.2 - versions specific to version 1.2 of j2ee
- 1.3 - much the same for 1.3
- common - versions common to both

We need to do the same for the jdk libraries so we can add in the new
SQL stuff

S.

Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] RE: [MO-java-dev] build revision in progress

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...>
> I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where
you
> guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing?

nice to see you got it working ;-)

it's under j2ee/common.

> There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as
well as
> an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee?

the j2ee files are split between
- 1.2 - versions specific to version 1.2 of j2ee
- 1.3 - much the same for 1.3
- common - versions common to both

We need to do the same for the jdk libraries so we can add in the new
SQL stuff

S.

RE: [Mockobjects-java-users] RE: [MO-java-dev] build revision in progress

[Tim M. <tim...@po...>]

Except that it doesn't work in that the tests don't pass because the class
is mising and it won't compile out of the box. We need a default lineup
where you can compile the default lineup. Is jdk 1.3 and j2ee bollocks this
lineup? (probably - if thats where servlets are located, and this is what
most people want to do from postings I see). Its quite easy for people to
ignore tests if they choose not to download other components.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Freeman [mailto:st...@m3...]
Sent: 25 February 2002 10:26
To: Tim Mackinnon; moc...@li...;
MockObjects
Subject: Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] RE: [MO-java-dev] build revision
in progress


From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...>
> I just did an anonymous checkout (into a clean directory) to see where
you
> guys are up to and MockServletOutputStream is missing?

nice to see you got it working ;-)

it's under j2ee/common.

> There also seems to be a number of empty directories for j2ee 1.2 as
well as
> an extra com.mockobjects bit in j2ee?

the j2ee files are split between
- 1.2 - versions specific to version 1.2 of j2ee
- 1.3 - much the same for 1.3
- common - versions common to both

We need to do the same for the jdk libraries so we can add in the new
SQL stuff

S.




---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002

Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] RE: [MO-java-dev] build revision in progress

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Well then, we need to move those tests that apply only to j2ee classes.
Similarly for the examples, which I haven't got around to yet. Given
that you chaps are about the only people I know still using Java 1.1,
would you like to put in any fixes for that version? We could finally
sort out that compatibility jar.

S.

From: "Tim Mackinnon" <tim...@po...>
> Except that it doesn't work in that the tests don't pass because the
class
> is mising and it won't compile out of the box. We need a default
lineup
> where you can compile the default lineup. Is jdk 1.3 and j2ee bollocks
this
> lineup? (probably - if thats where servlets are located, and this is
what
> most people want to do from postings I see). Its quite easy for people
to
> ignore tests if they choose not to download other components.