You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(8) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(279) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(149) |
Nov
(138) |
Dec
(52) |
2003 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(106) |
May
(170) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(71) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(9) |
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(2) |
2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
2006 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2001-08-01 08:35:04
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...> To: <moc...@li...> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 11:40 PM Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] Change of license ? > Hi, > > I would like to propose a change in the license. Would you agree to move > from Mozilla license to an Apache license (APL) ? The reason I have is > simply that it is easier to change license early in a project rather than > later and it seems Cactus and mockobjects might integrate/share/benefit from > each other more easily if the mockobject project was under an Apache license > (because Cactus is already using that license as an Apache project). For > example, Cactus could use mockobjects as its implementation for a MO > strategy ... > > What do you think ? > In principle I don't mind. What are the differences between the two licences? Steve |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-31 16:33:48
|
We now have a fully functional build process which does : - jar - documentation (local web site + javadoc) - site generation - unit tests - dist : build the distributables. Currently only one : mockobjects-0.01.zip containing |_ lib |_ mockobjects.jar |_ doc |_ local web site + javadoc Try it and tell me if you like it ! TODO: Depending on the answer to previous emails, we need to know what we do with the extensions and samples. For samples, I guess we can put them in mockobjects-0.01.zip. -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 18:12:50
|
Same as for the todo, there is now a changes page (<root>/doc/xdocs/changes.xml) that contain the history changes for all versions including the current one in CVS. This is a coarse-grained changelog and is intended mostly for users so that they know what's new in the latest release. For example, if we modify a file because a comment was wrongly aligned, it doesn't have to go in this changelog (it will be in the CVS changelog anyway). however, if have fixed a bug or modified namings in the code or ... then it needs to be there. Please remember to always edit this file when you make a change. Otherwise it is difficult and lengthy to find back what has been done (though it is possible using CVS). It also shows us what's been done so far on the current version, so it is a good indicator of progress. Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 17:57:48
|
Hi, I have added a todo/roadmap page : <root>/doc/xdocs/todo.xml The goal of this page is twofold : * first it shows to user what is left to be done before being able to release the following version, * second it lets everyone know who is working on what (I know there is also a task assignment tracker in SF that we may use for that. This is just a first draft. We may wish to remove the volunteer column later on and use this tracker later on - we'll see). So, if you think about a task that needs to be done, please update this file. This will be our preferred way of deciding what tasks are left and for what version to implement them. Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 17:52:40
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...> To: <moc...@li...> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:26 PM Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] www.mockobjects.com and the mockobjects project ... same ? > I'd like to know if we want to make them be the same thing or if we want to > make www.mockobjects.com a portal site regrouping anything that's related to > Mock Objects : articles, tools, books, ... and have the mockobjects project > simply be a possible implementation (in java to start with) ? > I have drafted the main page of the Mock Objects web site (in <root>/doc/xdocs/index.xml). Please tell me what you think. Also we need to find a better logo. The problem with the mock turtle logo is that it being black and white it does not lend well to resizing and is not clear and sharp at all when in small ... But being too big it eats almost all the page and the page titles look way too small in that big space ...:) Ideally we would need a logo that takes more space horizontally than vertically. > Thanks > -Vincent -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 17:24:41
|
I'd like to know if we want to make them be the same thing or if we want to make www.mockobjects.com a portal site regrouping anything that's related to Mock Objects : articles, tools, books, ... and have the mockobjects project simply be a possible implementation (in java to start with) ? Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 14:20:06
|
Hi, 1/ Why is there 2 directories : 'vaj' and 'visualage' in the extensions directory ? 2/ What is eziba ? 3/ Do we want to generate a separate jar file per extension, like one for atg, one for visualage, one for eziba, ... ? My answer would be yes and it seems it is the approach currently followed as proved by the released packages on SF Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 11:58:42
|
I have entered the following project description on SF (http://sf.net/projects/mockobjects). "Generic unit testing framework and methodology for testing any kind of code" Tell me what you think. If you have a better description, feel free to post it here. Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 11:50:52
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...> To: <moc...@li...> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 12:43 PM Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] Prepackaged Ant version > Building the mockobjects project requires : > - a JDK installed > - Ant installed with the needed tasks : stylebook (version 2), junit > - depending on what mocks we want to build, some external jars (like > servlet.jar if we want to build the servlet mocks, ...) > > In order to facilitate building the mockobjects project, I propose to > provide on the developer web site (i.e. SF) a prepackaged zip containing Ant > with the needed tasks already in there. This is what I have done on the > Cactus project and it's been very successful. > More precisely, I propose a new package named mockobjects-tools (in the notes area we mention that it contains tools to help build the project for developers and that it is not needed for end users) and put a file named : mockobjects-java-ant-YYYYMMDD.zip > Ok ? > -Vincent Massol |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 11:42:10
|
Building the mockobjects project requires : - a JDK installed - Ant installed with the needed tasks : stylebook (version 2), junit - depending on what mocks we want to build, some external jars (like servlet.jar if we want to build the servlet mocks, ...) In order to facilitate building the mockobjects project, I propose to provide on the developer web site (i.e. SF) a prepackaged zip containing Ant with the needed tasks already in there. This is what I have done on the Cactus project and it's been very successful. Ok ? -Vincent Massol |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 11:33:32
|
Hi, I'd like to propose the following src directory hierarchy src |_ framework |_ com |_ ... |_ tests |_ com |_ ... |_ extensions |_ com |_ ... |_ examples |_ com |_ ... Where : * framework : the core classes + mock implementations for the standard J2SE/J2EE classes, i.e. the standard APIs making the Java platform (servlet, taglib, io, sql, ...) * tests : the core classes unit tests. Note that there is no need for test classes for the mock implementations themselves as they don't contain logic (just getters/setters) * extensions : mock implementations for APIs that are _not_ part of the Java platform (J2SE/J2EE), like VisualAge for Java Tools API, Struts, ATG proprietary classes, ... * examples : comprehensive examples showing how to use the mockobject framework and also acting as functional tests for the mockobject framework. Can I go ahead with this and make the little needed modifications and put a README file that explains this ? Thanks -Vincent Massol |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 10:56:35
|
In <root>/src/core, there is jar file (mo_java1_compatibility.jar) containing sources. What is it and why are the sources in it not expanded, like the rest ? Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-30 09:54:41
|
I have removed the forum feature from the mockobjects SF developers' page as we have now switched to a mailing-list mechanism. Note: There were only a few messages posted on the forum and none contained information important enough to republish it to the mailing-list. However, the messages posted to the forum are not lost and the forum can be reactivated at any time by an admin if need be. Thanks -Vincent |
From: Vincent M. <vm...@oc...> - 2001-07-29 22:38:55
|
Hi, I would like to propose a change in the license. Would you agree to move from Mozilla license to an Apache license (APL) ? The reason I have is simply that it is easier to change license early in a project rather than later and it seems Cactus and mockobjects might integrate/share/benefit from each other more easily if the mockobject project was under an Apache license (because Cactus is already using that license as an Apache project). For example, Cactus could use mockobjects as its implementation for a MO strategy ... What do you think ? Thanks -Vincent Massol |