Re: [MO-java-dev] confused about naming/sql classes

[J. J. B. <jj...@re...>]

On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 05:40, Jeff Martin wrote:
> That's a good point. This all stems from javax.naming and javax.sql used
> to be optional to the jdk and so sat better in j2ee. However as of
> jdk1.3 javax.naming became part of the jdk and as of jdk1.4 to has
> javax.sql
> 
> We should probably move these across, although which classes go in which
> jars is going to depend on the jdk that being build against, which is
> going to confuse the shit outta me.

Jeff,

I can help out with this, as I need to sort this stuff out for a
project. I plan on looking at the build.xml file today...

Thanks,

j.joseph


> 
> 
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 02:59, J. Joseph Benavidez wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm trying to figure out the mockobject packages and how they're
> > distributed amongst the jar files.
> > 
> > My confusion stems from the fact that the naming.* (and some sql.*)
> > classes are in the j2ee jars, but javax.naming.* and javax.sql.* are in
> > the standard jdks.
> > 
> > Would it be possible to put those classes in their respective plain
> > jdk1.3/jdk1.4 jars and pull them out of the j2ee jars?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > j.joseph
> > 
> > 
> >