From: Stefan B. <bo...@ap...> - 2004-02-04 09:04:16
|
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Vincent Massol <vm...@pi...> wrote: > I haven't been following the discussion but for the record I think > using Gump is great and should be continued. I've seen a similar comment by Jeff in the archives (I tried to subscribe to mockobjects-java-dev but SF's mailing list manager was down yesterday, so I'm not yet subscribed). What I've done so far is that I've added mockobjects-0.09 and made all projects in Gump depend on that. Gump still tries to build the CVS HEAD revisions of mockobjects[1][2], but no other project depends on it and I've turned of nagging. Cheers Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://gump.covalent.net/log/mockobjects-cvs-head.html [2] it currently doesn't work in the new Python version, but we'll work on it. |