Re: [MO-java-dev] compilation problem for mockobjects

[Jeff M. <je...@cu...>]

No please keep it in gump, we obviously need it there or we wouldn't be
running around trying to fix things ;)

I really don't see that five mails over five days is really a huge price
to pay (Currently I'm getting 4000 a day courtesy of MyDoom)

I've now removed a couple of dodge files Nat pointed me to so hopefully
that's us sorted for a bit.


On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 07:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2004, Nat Pryce <nat...@b1...>
> wrote:
> 
> > Who put mockobjects.com into gump?  Whoever it is, they should sort
> > out the problem.
> 
> Oh my.
> 
> Having mockobjects built by Gump used to be appreciated by Jeff and
> Vincent.  Given that cactus relies on mockobjects and also relies on
> Gump quite a bit, this seemed natural.
> 
> There is no problem with removing mockobjects from Gump if that is
> what you want.  I'll take care of it.
> 
> Cheers
> 
>         Stefan
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
-- 
Jeff Martin
 
Memetic Engineer
 
http://www.custommonkey.org/