Re: [MO-java-dev] compilation problem for mockobjects

[Nat P. <nat...@b1...>]

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 16:25, Jeff Martin wrote:
> Err, it's probably coming from the original Apache Gump hence my name on
> the mail.
> 
> But it's not they're problem it's ours. It's the responsibility of
> whoever checked in the broken code into CVS.

I don't disagree with that.

> People running Gump are
> doing us a favour by checking our code, as a responsible project we
> should be ensure that our code compiles and that all the tests are
> passing.

That's as maybe. It would be nice if they had let us know what they were
doing before they started sending loads of error messages onto the dev
mailing list.

Cheers,
	Nat.