Re: [MO-java-dev] compilation problem for mockobjects

[<an...@an...>]

Steve Freeman wrote:

> We're investigating, since someone else did the gump configuration and=20
> I don't actually know what's involved. A bit tricky since I'm away on=20
> site at the moment.
>
> S.
>
> Antoine L=E9vy-Lambert wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> do you think you will be able to fix mockobjects so that it compiles
>> on gump soon ?
>>
>> I need mockobjects because it is an indirect dependency of=20
>> ant-xdocs-proposals.
>>
>> A lot of other projects are dependent upon mockobjects.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>
For me the failure does  not seem related to Gump :

core.test.mockobjects.dynamic.InvocationMatcherTest

this class does not compile because it tries to use the
internal class
com.mockobjects.dynamic.InvocationMatcher.Arguments
which was suppressed on the 29th of October :
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/mockobjects/mockobjects-java/src/co=
re/com/mockobjects/dynamic/InvocationMatcher.java?r1=3D1.3&r2=3D1.4

Antoine