Re: [MO-java-dev] dynamic branch and merge

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Folks (and especially Vincent). I've been trying to find a way to break 
through the morass of overloading to come up with a cleaner API for the 
dynamics and it's not easy to do it incrementally. Maybe I'm just too 
tired, or need a pair, but the backwards compatibility is getting in the 
way.

I know Vincent's written it up in his book, but is there anyone else 
that an API change would hurt? Or a way to do it under the covers?

S.

Vincent Massol wrote:
> Is this going to break the DynaMock API from released version 0.09?
> 
> In any case I believe we should absolutely provide backward
> compatibility and mark changed methods as deprecated. All new public
> methods should also be tagged with the "@since" javadoc tag.