Re: [MO-java-dev] ActiveCall class

[Joe W. <jo...@tr...>]

Tim Mackinnon wrote:

>The idea of ActiveCall is a good one (I'm not too keen on the name myself -
>why is it active?) - Actually more to the point I'm kind of suprised its got
>no behavior at all (making it even less active?).
>
How about InactiveCall?

-joe