RE: [MO-java-dev] ActiveCall class

[Tim M. <tim...@po...>]

The idea of ActiveCall is a good one (I'm not too keen on the name myself -
why is it active?) - Actually more to the point I'm kind of suprised its got
no behavior at all (making it even less active?).

I would expect it to do work in deciding whether it was equal to a Method
(e.g. what invoke() gets) ...???

Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf Of
> Steve Freeman
> Sent: 05 July 2003 16:18
> To: 'Mockobjects-Java-Dev'
> Subject: [MO-java-dev] ActiveCall class
>
>
> being at a loose end, I took an executive decision and added a first cut
> at ActiveCall to the head release. I tagged before doing this so we can
> always roll back. It really starts to make the code collapse and I can
> see how some of the tests could be simplified.
>
> Any objections?
>
> S.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 30/06/2003