RE: [MO-java-dev] dynamic branch and merge

[Vincent M. <vm...@pi...>]

Is this going to break the DynaMock API from released version 0.09?

In any case I believe we should absolutely provide backward
compatibility and mark changed methods as deprecated. All new public
methods should also be tagged with the "@since" javadoc tag.

Thank you
-Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...] On Behalf Of
> Steve Freeman
> Sent: 03 July 2003 01:25
> To: moc...@li...
> Subject: [MO-java-dev] dynamic branch and merge
> 
> folks, given that some people aren't totally happy with nat's branch,
> how about we start implementing the few bits we agree on in the HEAD?
> For example, adding the ActiveCall object. That way we can make /some/
> progress and the merge will be less painful.
> 
> S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
>
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev