Re: [MO-java-dev] DynaMock proxy toString issue

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

chris cottee wrote:
> I think there need to be some functional tests for Mock as well as the 
> mocked unit tests. Functional tests
> are (in this case) better at expressing the intent of the code since 
> they are effectively examples of usage.

Agreed. We've talked about writing some fit tests that would apply to 
both the java and C# versions.

I'm beginning to find the current unit tests problematic too. I've been 
trying to add Chris's idea of just adding some default matches for 
methods like toString() and it's a right pain (and shouldn't necessarily 
  be visible in the tests).

Chris are you implementing all this in 0.09. If so, I'll stop. Also, I 
suggest you break up your proposed additional unit tests into 4 specific 
tests, rather than one big one.

Steve