Re: [MO-java-dev] CallBag is a Callable?

[<st...@m3...>]

> I'm worried that we'll refactor out flexibility that will be very difficu=
lt
> to put back in when somebody needs it.  The previous version of the dynam=
ic
> mocks was a little too inflexible, and mock objects created by the core
> library are very inflexible and need to be modified too frequently.
>=20
> The idea of making CallBag and CallSequence implement Call is to find a
> happy medium between the simplicity of sequences or choices of expected
> calls and the over-complexity of state machines.

In which case, perhaps we should distinguish between Callable and Matchable=
? To me, the current situation is confusing because we have 2 implementatio=
ns that will fail if you try to use them as Callables.

S.