Re: [MO-java-dev] mock parameter in call() method?

[Nat P. <nat...@b1...>]

From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...>
> Do we want to drop it, then? The c# equivalent doesn't pass the object
> through.

Actually, let's drop it.  I've realised that you can get the same effect
using other Java mechanisms -- instance variables or final variables and
inner classes, for example.  It's better to be consistent with other Mock
libraries.

Cheers,
            Nat.