From: <st...@m3...> - 2003-06-10 09:52:05
|
I've been looking through the code again, and I'm not convinced that CallBa= g and CallSequence are Calleable, as defined by the interface. Even though = both implement a call() method, both throw a (different) exception on the m= atches method and so don't conform to the interface. Presumably the idea wa= s to be able to use collection in a daisy chain of calls, but are we being = too general? Do we have a concrete example of where this is useful? I'm inclined to think that the CallableAddable and CallCollection should be= merged in some way? S. |