Re: [MO-java-dev] mock parameter in call() method?

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Do we want to drop it, then? The c# equivalent doesn't pass the object 
through.

S.

Nat Pryce wrote:
> I needed it in a project that used the old dynamic mock package (that didn't
> support it and needed modification), which is why I added it to the new
> DynaMock package.
> 
> I agree that it's pretty a rare requirement though.