From: Nat P. <nat...@b1...> - 2003-06-09 16:04:12
|
I needed it in a project that used the old dynamic mock package (that didn't support it and needed modification), which is why I added it to the new DynaMock package. I agree that it's pretty a rare requirement though. Regards, Nat. _______________________ Dr. Nathaniel Pryce B13media Ltd. http://www.b13media.com +44 (0)7712 526 661 ----- Original Message ----- From: <st...@m3...> To: <moc...@li...> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:46 AM Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] mock parameter in call() method? > It allows mocked call to have access to "this", which is useful if you need > to mock side effects. I can see that it /might/ be useful. I'm just struck that it hasn't been so far. Perhaps we've overestimated the requirement. S. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list Moc...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev |