From: Barry K. <bk...@in...> - 2003-05-20 12:57:54
|
Just a first observation on the 0.9 changes. It now appears that a mock must be order or not across all methods. I tend to setup my mocks to be ordered or not on an individual method basis. I only order methods when the semantics explicitly require it. But when a mock method(s) needs to be ordered and counted, most other methods can be of the match*() type (ie, any number of calls in any order). Is such a setup still possible now that a mock cannot be given a Call? I like the idea of not requiring the use of CallSequence, but not the prevention of its use when necessary. Again, I'll covert over to 0.9 and get some concrete experience and report back and update the twiki. -bk |