RE: [MO-java-dev] [new dyna mock] Bug?

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Guys,

I need your help! I've been trying to migrate my existing project to the
new Dyna Mock for the past few days and I'm stuck...

The tests I am trying to migrate are located here: 

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/junitbook/junitbook/ejb/m
ockobjects/

If you are working with Eclipse, the easiest it to import first the
repository/ project
(http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/junitbook/junitbook/repo
sitory/) in your workspace, rename it to junitbook-repository (it is
imported with the name "repository" by default) and then import the
ejb/mockobjects project
(http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/junitbook/junitbook/ejb/
mockobjects/).

(these projects are already Eclipse projects)

The CVS information is available on
http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=68011

The tests to look at in priority are:
- junitbook.ejb.service3.TestPetstoreEJB
- junitbook.ejb.domain.TestOrderUtil

The 2 tests demonstrate the issue I have been describing below.

Thanks a bunch
-Vincent

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Mackinnon [mailto:tim...@po...]
> > Sent: 16 May 2003 02:02
> > To: Vincent Massol
> > Subject: RE: [MO-java-dev] [new dyna mock] Bug?
> >
> > Hmmm thats weird? There is no specific test for that as we assume
that
> > junit
> > has independant tests, and there is no global state in the dynamic
> stuff
> > (it
> > folds with the test). The library has also been used quite a bit by
> the
> > e2x
> > guys who have lots of concurrent tests....and not reported this one.
> >
> > If you can help by debugging or creating a test we can have look.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: moc...@li...
> > > [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf
> Of
> > > Vincent Massol
> > > Sent: 15 May 2003 10:08
> > > To: 'Mockobjects-Java-Dev'
> > > Subject: [MO-java-dev] [new dyna mock] Bug?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have the following 2 tests:
> > >
> > >     public void testCreateOrderOk() throws Exception
> > >     {
> > >         mockQueueConnectionFactory.expectAndReturn(
> > >             "createQueueConnection", queueConnection);
> > >
> > >         int orderId = petstore.createOrder(new Date(), "item1");
> > >
> > >         assertEquals(1234, orderId);
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     public void testCreateThrowsOrderException() throws Exception
> > >     {
> > >         mockQueueConnectionFactory.expectAndThrow(
> > >             "createQueueConnection", new JMSException("error"));
> > >
> > >         try
> > >         {
> > >             petstore.createOrder(new Date(), "item1");
> > >             fail("Should have thrown an EJBException");
> > >         }
> > >         catch (EJBException expected)
> > >         {
> > >             assertEquals("error",
> > >                 expected.getCausedByException().getMessage());
> > >         }
> > >     }
> > >
> > > The second test (testCreateThrowsOrderException()) fails with the
> > > following error:
> > >
> > > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: mockQueueConnectionFactory:
> > > Unexpected call: createQueueConnection()
> > > Expected one of:
> > > createQueueConnection() [called]
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > If I comment out the testCreateOrderOk() method it works...
> > >
> > > It seems that the 2 tests are overstepping each other and that the
> > > second mock expectAndThrow() is not taken into account because the
> mock
> > > has already been set up by the first test! Glurps....
> > >
> > > Any idea? Do we have a test case for this scenario in our test
> suite?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa
> Clara
> > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise
> solutions
> > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> > > Moc...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 24/04/2003
> > >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 24/04/2003
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise
solutions
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev