RE: [MO-java-dev] Refactoring when using dymanic.Mock?

[Tim M. <tim...@po...>]

On a team of two pairs in a smallish project it was ok for us using
Eclipse... I havne't got larger figures to report yet. On the plus side, the
test first experience is much better.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf Of
> Barry Kaplan
> Sent: 14 May 2003 14:38
> To: mockobjects
> Subject: [MO-java-dev] Refactoring when using dymanic.Mock?
>
>
> What has been the experience (if any) of the use of refactoring tools
> when using the dynamic.Mock class? Specifically, the use of strings for
> specifying method names? With idea, I can ask to check for strings when
> performing a refactoring, but finding usages is out.
>
> I can't think of any other alternative though, so I though I would ask
> around.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 24/04/2003
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 24/04/2003