Re: [MO-java-dev] [New DynaMock] Why is there no match() method?

[Joe W. <jo...@tr...>]

Vincent Massol wrote:

>Hi,
>
>There is an expect() method (replacing the old expectVoid()), but there
>is no match() method. Any reason?
>  
>
The only use of match() is to setup return values - so it's not needed 
for void methods.

-joe