RE: [MO-java-dev] First batch of questions on new Dynamic Mock API

[Vincent M. <vm...@pi...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Mackinnon [mailto:tim...@po...]
> Sent: 14 May 2003 02:18
> To: Vincent Massol; 'Mockobjects-Java-Dev'
> Subject: RE: [MO-java-dev] First batch of questions on new Dynamic
Mock
> API
> 

[snip]

> 
> I think we finally got to the bottom of the stuff now - and I hope
this
> has
> helped get a better description for your book.

It has. Thanks a lot! I still maintain that the issue #1 with
MockObjects.com is documentation... :-)

Tim, I can assure you not everyone is used to reading the source code
when using a third-party framework. I'm currently working on a project
and the main issue to using MockObjects.com is documentation. I can't
fire the 80+ developers telling them that they are not good enough...
(Maybe 2 or 3 would be 1/ able to follow and understand the source code
and 2/ willing to do so). Thus, the project manager has tasked me to
write the missing MockObjects.com missing documentation for our
project... *sigh* I have been postponing this as I also don't like to
write doc and I have better things to do... This is just an example to
show you that *from the outside* the MockObjects.com suffers from
documentation.

-Vincent