RE: [MO-java-dev] New dyna mocks to head?

[Jeff M. <je...@mk...>]

Personally I think DynaMock is really cheesy. I'd prefer the more mature
Dynamic Mock. Does that make me boring?

Actually what about Mynamic ;)=20

On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 08:25, Vincent Massol wrote:
> I personally like DynaMock as it really has a nice ring and it still
> reminds us that we're talking about Mocks. I wouldn't care about the
> fact that "Dyna" looks like "Dynamic Proxy". For me "Dyna" simply means
> dynamic, which is more positive than static and suggests that we're
> doing stuff at runtime versus compile time.
>=20
> My 0.2=E2=82=AC
> -Vincent
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ayerst, Tom [mailto:Tom...@DR...]
> > Sent: 12 May 2003 09:01
> > To: 'Joe Walnes'; Steve Freeman
> > Cc: Tim Mackinnon; Vincent Massol; 'Mockobjects-Java-Dev'
> > Subject: RE: [MO-java-dev] New dyna mocks to head?
> >=20
> > 	Proxy
> >         |
> >     +---+---+
> >     |       |
> >    Moxy    Boxy
> >=20
> > ? :-)
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Walnes [mailto:jo...@tr...]
> > Sent: 12 May 2003 06:51
> > To: Steve Freeman
> > Cc: Tim Mackinnon; Vincent Massol; 'Mockobjects-Java-Dev'
> > Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] New dyna mocks to head?
> >=20
> >=20
> > Steve Freeman wrote:
> >=20
> > > another thing, after all that naming stuff last week. The getter in
> > > the .Net version is called MockInstance(), which seems to describe
> the
> > > situation quite adequately.
> >=20
> > I prefer MockInstance because it doesnt tie the api into the fact tha=
t
> > the mock object is generated using a dynamic proxy. For example, the
> > enhancements I made to allow classes (as well as interfaces) to be
> > mocked used byte code generation instead of a proxy. That's also
> another
> > reason not to call it Moxy.
> >=20
> > -j
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise
> solutions
> > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
> >=20
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> > Moc...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
> >=20
> >=20
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
> > If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
> > disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
> > http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solution=
s
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
--=20
------------------------------
jeff martin
information technologist
mkodo limited

mobile: 44 (0) 78 55 478 331
phone: 44 (0) 20 77 29 45 45
email: jef...@mk...

www.mkodo.com

73 Leonard St, London, EC2A 4QS. U.K