RE: [MO-java-dev] New dyna mocks to head?

[Ayerst, T. <Tom...@DR...>]

	Proxy
        |
    +---+---+
    |       |
   Moxy    Boxy

? :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Walnes [mailto:jo...@tr...]
Sent: 12 May 2003 06:51
To: Steve Freeman
Cc: Tim Mackinnon; Vincent Massol; 'Mockobjects-Java-Dev'
Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] New dyna mocks to head?


Steve Freeman wrote:

> another thing, after all that naming stuff last week. The getter in 
> the .Net version is called MockInstance(), which seems to describe the 
> situation quite adequately. 

I prefer MockInstance because it doesnt tie the api into the fact that 
the mock object is generated using a dynamic proxy. For example, the 
enhancements I made to allow classes (as well as interfaces) to be 
mocked used byte code generation instead of a proxy. That's also another 
reason not to call it Moxy.

-j




-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

_______________________________________________
Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
Moc...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev


----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
----------------------------------------------------------------------