Re: [MO-java-dev] New dyna mocks to head?

[Joe W. <jo...@tr...>]

Steve Freeman wrote:

> another thing, after all that naming stuff last week. The getter in 
> the .Net version is called MockInstance(), which seems to describe the 
> situation quite adequately. 

I prefer MockInstance because it doesnt tie the api into the fact that 
the mock object is generated using a dynamic proxy. For example, the 
enhancements I made to allow classes (as well as interfaces) to be 
mocked used byte code generation instead of a proxy. That's also another 
reason not to call it Moxy.

-j