From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2003-05-11 23:13:42
|
another thing, after all that naming stuff last week. The getter in the .Net version is called MockInstance(), which seems to describe the situation quite adequately. Tim, I expect you'll getting more intimate with .Net in your new role. Good luck. S. Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Oh yes - forgot to add, we did a bit of an excerise with the name, and I > think your name "DynaMock" appears to be the best (there was some talk about > Moxy - but a google search shows lots of other things by that name, one > specific one is a type of proxy library as well). > > So I would like to sort out what we can, and then re-launch the thing with > the name. |