Re: [MO-java-dev] [dynamic] Question about MethodMap.verify()

[Barry K. <bk...@in...>]

Nat Pryce wrote:

>If you use decorators around MockCall (e.g. CallSequence or a CallCount)
>you have to explcitly verify those objects yourself.
>
>Hmm... perhaps the Mock class should test to see if the MockCall is
>Verifiable and then automatically verify it if it is.  What do people
>think?
>
>  
>
+1