RE: [MO-java-dev] Congrats for Dynamic Mocks

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

[snip]
> 
> > I also think that the default return value for the String class
should
> > be null and not "", as null is what anyone expects when an object
has
> > not been defined. Thus, I find myself adding:
> >
> >         mock.setupDefaultResult(String.class, null);
> >
> > in the setUp() methods of lots of my test cases.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> surely that would apply to any return type, not just strings? Are your
> test
> for getting property values back?

There are already default results for lots of types. I think the default
values should the ones defined by the JVM specification (which is null
for Objects).

Yes, my tests are for getting HTTP parameters (getParameter()).

Thanks
-Vincent